pixyled:

Here’s the first one I’m going to write about.
This one is completely laughable.
Given the track record for the pro-life movement, the LAST thing they really want yo to do is educate yourself. Because if you know, yknow, ACTUAL FACTS about abortion instead of just emotional arguments, you’ll most likely be pro-choice.


Here’s another one.  “Given a choice, they’d want a chance.” Now, I’m assuming the “they” are the fetuses.
This is a completely untrue statement.
I gaurantee 100% that if you were to go to a fetus and ask it “Do you want a chance, or would you mind being aborted so that this woman can fulfill a good life?”
The fetus
Would say

Fucking nothing.

Because of the whole “NON-SENTIENT, NON-AWARE” thing.
So no. The fetuses don’t WANT anything. In order to have desires, you have to, first of all, have a brain, and second of all, sentience. Neither of which a fetus has.


I agree with this one. Tree’s AREN’T the only things worth saving.
Women who would otherwise die due to back alley abortions are definitely worth saving, too. Let’s keep saving them


I, again, agree with this one.
Slogans prove nothing.
Facts, however, due.
That happens to be what the pro-choice side has as our weapon. See, we don’t depend on emotions and lies to be the basis of our platform.


From what side? I’m supposing you mean the fetus’ side?
Well, see, I would, but I can’t. Because of the fact fetuses can’t see.
Nor can they speak, or have opinions, or empathize, or,y’know, anything.
And perhaps you should take a look at the “other side”: the side of what would happen if abortions were illegal. Look for some news stories about the experiences of women in the Philippines that have been circulating around tumblr.


We are. You’re the ones who aren’t. Injustice would be punishing a woman for having sex by forcing her to carry to term a fetus that is unwanted. It’s treating her like an incubator. It’s saying that this fetus has a right to the woman’s uterus, even though under no other circumstances would an ACTUAL human being be allowed to another person’s body without consent, all because she dared to get raped, or dared to have sex.


No, you see in order for there to be “love”, there must be empathy. The anti-choice side doesn’t attempt at all to understand what these women are going through, nor do they care or even TRY to see anything besides the clump of cells inside her uterus. That’s not love. Especially since people who identify as pro-life tend to also be against anything that would help the fetus once it actually becomes a baby.



This one doesn’t even make fucking sense. Moving on.


This is debatable. This blanket statement is obviously referring to fetuses and abortion. It’s a blanket statement that leaves 0 leeway room for putting in even an effort to consider the conditions a child would be born into. Also, it’s clear it only applies to the fetus. Because if the woman dies by being forced to give birth to a child her body couldn’t support, then who cares. And if a woman dies by a back alley abortion, then who cares. But the fetus dies with her then OH WAIT.

Yes, speak for the weak. Speak for the underprivileged woman who can’t afford birth control and weren’t taught about sex education due to restrictions. By saying “Actually, I don’t want an abortion I’d rather be racked into debt by expensive medical bills or put my life in threat by a back alley abortion because I’m a slut who dared to have sex or get raped.” That’s who you’re speaking for, right? Because we can’t have her SPEAKING FOR HERSELF. Oh wait no you’re talking about the FETUS right?THAT’S who you’re speaking for! Because CLEARLY the woman doesn’t matter. It’s not like it’s her body or anything that the fetus is attached to.


Oh good you get it! You have to be BORN before you can “die”. So we’re not really causing fetus’ to die because they have no brain activity and therefore don’t fit the medical definition of “alive”!



Anyways. That’s all for now. Just wanted to share.